Slippage & Charges Zen, Damper and Curvature

There is a slippage of 3% every month, when Stratzy shows in a month 5% profit, basically in our account it will be Zero profit due to 3% of slippage and 2% of charges and taxes. If Straty shows 100% profit in a year in practical we will see in our account 40% profit in a year. Same time when Stratzy shows drawdown of 20%, in our account it shows 25% to 30% drawdown.

Stratzy data is misleading the people. Not sure on what basis Damper and Curvature trades are taken, Always it is shorted at and market reverses. I have started Curvature on June 12, it never recovered from the losses and still it shows 20% negative in my account, they way trades are taken in the Curvature and Damper. I have completely dissapointed.

2 Likes

Hi @Praveen_Kammari

Thank you for sharing your observations.

I would, however, like to clarify that describing Stratzy’s performance data as misleading is not accurate.

The historical performance displayed on Stratzy represents the Algo’s trade outcomes based on its predefined execution logic. It is intended to show how the strategy has historically performed and should not be interpreted as a guarantee that every user will achieve identical LIVE results.

In LIVE markets, actual execution varies from user to user due to several factors, including slippage, brokerage, statutory charges, taxes, and prevailing market conditions. These factors are outside the Algo’s strategy logic and are clearly disclosed under the Risk Disclosures & Disclaimers available on every Algo page.

Slippage, in particular, is an inherent aspect of algorithmic trading and cannot be represented using a fixed percentage. It varies from trade to trade depending on the instrument being traded, available liquidity, volatility, and market conditions at the exact time an order is executed. There may be trades with negligible slippage, trades with favourable slippage, and trades with higher slippage during volatile market conditions. Similarly, brokerage and statutory charges differ across brokers, brokerage plans, turnover, and applicable taxes.

For this reason, assuming that a fixed percentage should be deducted from every historical trade would not make the displayed performance more accurate. In fact, it would replace one assumption with another, as execution costs are dynamic and differ across users and market conditions.

Regarding Algo trades, both Algos execute trades strictly according to their predefined strategy logic and entry criteria. The direction of a trade is determined entirely by the Algo’s logic under prevailing market conditions and should not be evaluated based on a short period of performance alone.

We encourage users to evaluate Algos over a sufficiently long horizon while considering practical aspects such as execution costs, market conditions, and risk metrics.

We appreciate you taking the time to share your feedback.

1 Like

Is the trades showing in the platform are just signals generated by that particular algo or the live trades that you are running in your real demat account ?

I have observerved some latency between trades in platform and trades in our account , also are you executing trades in multiple batches for users or executing at exact same time for everyone ?

Hi @Avinash

A similar query regarding the trades displayed on the platform has already been addressed in one of our community discussions.

I request you to please refer to the discussion here:

If you have any further queries after going through the post, please feel free to write to us at support@stratzy.in, and we’ll be happy to assist you further.